The video "Born on a Noose-EMERGENCY NOOSECAST!" mixes humor and serious commentary as it tackles various issues within the comic book community , particularly focusing on topics like drug addiction, doxxing, and ongoing disputes among creators and fans. Characters Jenny Lewis and Daddy Mataro use playful lyrics to warn against the dangers of drugs while promoting the importance of seeking help. The speakers express frustrations about rivalry and unprofessional behaviors among creators in the Comicsgate community, with ongoing drama and conflicts highlighted. They engage with their audience through a lively, chaotic live stream filled with humorous banter, technical difficulties, and interspersed serious discussions about the integrity of the community and its evolving nature, particularly concerning the controversial figure, Katie. The overall atmosphere reflects a blend of lightheartedness and critique, capturing the chaos and camaraderie of the community.
00:00:00 In this section, the video features a blend of humorous and cautionary messages about drug use, particularly focusing on crack cocaine. Characters Jenny Lewis and Daddy Mataro emphasize the negative consequences of drug addiction, urging viewers to avoid trying drugs altogether and to seek help if they are already struggling with substance abuse. The segment includes playful yet crude lyrical expressions about the complications and shame stemming from drug use, paired with musical interludes. Ultimately, it reflects a mix of comedic relief and serious advice, highlighting the importance of family support and self-care in overcoming addiction challenges.
00:05:00 In this section, the speaker reflects on a competition within the comic community, expressing a sense of futility over a recent conflict where one individual seemingly "defeated" another with far fewer followers, highlighting the lack of significance in their rivalry. They introduce a humorous notion of launching a "Raptor coin," dismissing a "witch coin" mentioned by another, while appreciating the design of a particular coin related to a campaign. The overall tone oscillates between sarcasm and critique, addressing the elaborate but ultimately trivial nature of these comic-related disputes.
00:10:00 In this section, the speakers express their frustration with ongoing drama in the comic book community, particularly with individuals who publicly attack others after receiving support. One speaker highlights their disappointment in how creators they've promoted can turn hostile, labeling this behavior as unprofessional. They call for a more mature attitude among creators and criticizes the drama surrounding personalities like "Lord Raptor Jesus." The conversation then veers into a mix of humor and absurdity, as they discuss random anecdotes, including humorous exchanges about food and exaggerative storytelling, ultimately creating a chaotic and lighthearted atmosphere.
00:15:00 In this section, the host opens the show with a lively welcome to the "Born on a Noose" emergency newscast, expressing excitement about the controversial topics to be discussed, particularly surrounding doxxing and conflicts within the comics community. The atmosphere is charged as the host addresses a recent meltdown involving an individual named John, hinting at chaotic events that transpired in a livestream earlier that day. As they prepare to delve into the latest incidents, the host engages with the chat, setting the stage for what promises to be a dramatic and entertaining deep dive into the happenings of the day, while also teasing various clips and receipts that will be shared throughout the broadcast.
00:20:00 In this section, the speaker discusses the ongoing drama within the Comicsgate community, revealing that Anna has been expelled from the group after becoming involved in a conflict. The speaker expresses frustration over being labeled a "hack" while defending their long-standing support of Comicsgate and criticizing others for their behavior. They engage with the audience in a lively manner, addressing various comments and questions, while also touching on topics of doxxing and internal disputes that have arisen, highlighting how the situation has disrupted the community's original intentions and camaraderie. There is a clear sense of chaos and discontent among the members, reflected in the speaker's tone and the mixed reactions from the audience.
00:25:00 In this section, the speaker engages with his audience during a live stream, expressing confusion and excitement over various chat comments and interactions. He acknowledges the presence of notable individuals in the chat and addresses humorous topics, such as being nicknamed and discussing the chaotic nature of the stream. Amidst the playful banter, he also touches on serious issues of doxxing and the challenges faced by creators and fans within the community. Overall, the section captures a lively and somewhat disorganized atmosphere, where the host and viewers engage in lighthearted dialogue interspersed with deeper discussions about the state of their fandom and the industry.
00:30:00 In this section, the host engages in a lively and chaotic exchange with viewers during a live broadcast, filled with humorous banter and playful insults. They acknowledge various super chats, interacting with fans and acknowledging their comments about a supposed "holy war," as well as referencing a wanted poster and avatars for an upcoming awards show. The conversation progresses with comedic misinterpretations of comments, random chatter about obscure topics, and a flurry of messages showcasing fan involvement. The host expresses a mix of confusion and amusement as they navigate through the rapidly flowing chat, highlighting a sense of camaraderie and spirited entertainment among the participants.
00:35:00 In this section, the speaker addresses someone named Cherry with frustration, hinting at a conflict involving financial matters. The atmosphere is lively, as the speaker encourages the audience to prepare for an engaging show, despite technical difficulties related to audio and screen sharing. There is an ongoing struggle with stream setup, and the speaker expresses disappointment at not being able to share drawing sessions with the audience due to unfamiliarity with the streaming platform's features. The speaker also acknowledges the audience's presence and mentions trying to remedy the situation while interacting with guests appearing on the stream.
00:40:00 In this section, the hosts discuss various technical issues with their iPads while humorously trying to engage with viewers. They also touch upon recent events in the comics community, mentioning conflict involving customers and creators, including an incident where long-time supporters are being doxxed. The conversation meanders through light-hearted banter about a truck, a humorous commentary on the names of certain products, and the absurdity of recent streaming choices made by another creator. The hosts seem both frustrated and amused by the chaos within their community, reflecting on their experiences and interactions with each other and their audience.
00:45:00 In this section, the speaker discusses a poll conducted by a controversial figure, which sparked a discussion about the presence of a certain individual, referred to as Katie, within a community. The speaker points out that Katie has become a prominent figure in Comicsgate (CG) despite her questionable behavior and actions, which included inflammatory remarks and drama with other members of the community. This has raised concerns about the integrity of the CG movement, particularly in light of its original intention to oppose the perceived degeneracy present in mainstream comics. The speaker critiques the hypocrisy within the community, noting that while figures with problematic backgrounds have been criticized, Katie seems to be given a free pass. The narrative highlights a perceived double standard regarding the treatment of individuals based on gender and past controversies, as well as dissatisfaction with the evolving nature of the CG movement.
00:50:00 In this section, the speakers discuss their frustrations with certain individuals in the online community who are defending someone named Katie despite her controversial actions. They emphasize that their critique is not about anime itself but about the behavior of the individuals involved. The conversation shifts to a chat incident where a viewer repeatedly spammed requests related to "dog content," which the speakers found annoying and against their chat rules. They reflect on how some creators prioritize appealing to a male audience through attractive figures, questioning the effectiveness of such strategies. The speakers also express a desire to steer the discussion away from the chaos and focus on more pressing topics, but feel hindered by distractions from others who continue to rehash the same issues. Overall, they display a mix of annoyance and determination to maintain the intended focus of their stream.
00:55:00 In this section, the speaker discusses an online interaction where they were temporarily banned from a channel after requesting that the host follow through on a poll. The conversation veers into humorous exchanges about a character's frequent use of the phrase “dog [__],” with multiple mentions of its absurdity and impact on the audience. The speaker also references off-putting themes and controversies related to another individual, Katie, who has been criticized for her associations with contentious topics, particularly concerning underage subjects. This leads to a broader commentary on the strange dynamics of online communities and their often bizarre discussions, which seem to center on sensational or provocative content.
The YouTube video "Born on a Noose-EMERGENCY NOOSECAST! 'COMICSGATE DOXXING CUSTOMERS, AND ATTACKING OG FANS!'" features a chaotic and irreverent discussion among the hosts regarding controversial figures and events in the comic book community. The conversation centers around individuals like Katie, who links personal information online, provoking outrage over objectionable fanfiction, and John, who is mocked for his trivial discussions about topics such as dogs. The hosts engage in humorous banter and critiques, particularly targeting perceived hypocrisies, personal grievances, and artistic abilities, all while maintaining a lighthearted tone filled with inside jokes and sarcasm. This playful mockery extends to a range of personalities, including a character dubbed Lord Raptor Jesus, and touches on themes of doxing, online rivalries, and the absurdity of their community's dynamics, inviting viewers into a satirical exploration of niche internet culture.
01:00:00 In this section, the discussion revolves around a person named Katie and the implications of her public online presence, specifically how she linked personal information across various platforms, making it easily accessible. The speakers express outrage over inappropriate fanfiction themes, condemning such content and calling out individuals associated with it. They highlight Katie's challenge to the audience to investigate her links, suggesting she believed there was nothing questionable about her post history. The conversation also shifts towards humorous commentary on artwork shared by a participant named Liam, who seems to mimic the appearance of one of the speakers, leading to a light-hearted but chaotic interaction filled with inside jokes and memes related to the ongoing discussion.
01:05:00 In this section, the speakers discuss various individuals and their obsession with a particular subject, humorously referencing a trend of discussing dogs in detail, to the point of mockery. They mention interactions with John and Liam, noting that viewers might come to see one personality but end up captivated by another's rants. The conversation meanders through past episodes and experiences, including a notable time when Ethan Van Skyver joined a chat to talk about dogs, leading to laughter among participants. As they critique certain figures in the comic community for elevating unqualified voices, they allude to disingenuous behavior and express disbelief over the inappropriate topics being discussed, suggesting that some people in the community are out of touch with comic culture. Additionally, there are comments on the emotional reactions of those involved, specifically concerning legal threats over the content of discussions, culminating in a humorous take on the state of their community and its bizarre fixation on such themes.
01:10:00 In this section, the conversation revolves around a character named Lord Raptor Jesus and his channel's tendency to focus on absurd topics, particularly a recurring discussion about dogs. The speakers critique the channel's fixation, noting that it often overshadows more serious discussions about a figure named Katie. The humor presents a mix of mockery and irreverence, as the speakers express incredulity over the audience's preferences, suggesting that conversations about inappropriate topics are more engaging for them. They share jokes about the implications of these interests while contemplating creating content that reflects this bizarre fixation, ultimately poking fun at the lowbrow nature of some discussions in this community.
01:15:00 In this section, the speakers engage in a heated discussion about a recent online altercation, highlighting personal grievances and criticisms directed at a person named John. They mock him for his apparent obsession with discussing various trivial topics, including the peculiar claim that he can't draw pumpkins quickly. The speakers also delve into John's controversial content, suggesting that his work includes shocking themes such as violence and inappropriate content involving children. Accusations fly back and forth about the quality of each other's work and the nature of their online personas, resulting in a chaotic exchange filled with insults and references to each other's creative outputs. Overall, the segment portrays a toxic environment where personal attacks and artistic criticisms blend together amid chaotic banter.
01:20:00 In this section, the speaker sarcastically addresses accusations of being 'degenerates' and 'perverts' while humorously assembling a fictional weapon called the "Red Rockets." They criticize a person named Matt Bar for spreading lies and challenge him to provide evidence for his claims. As they mock what they perceive as blind followers of Bar and others, they make humorous references to pop culture figures, comparing them to Shane Davis and mocking the originality of certain styles. The speaker emphasizes the absurdity of the drama in their community, portraying it as a ridiculous spectacle fueled by personal grievances and competitive rivalries, while also showcasing a chaotic, irreverent sense of humor throughout the commentary.
01:25:00 In this section, the hosts engage in a humorous and irreverent discussion about various online personalities, touching on their eccentric behaviors and interests, particularly focusing on one individual's unusual fixation on dogs. They exchange jokes about their fan interactions, refer to trophies humorously awarded for outlandish behaviors, and discuss how certain figures in the comic book community influence each other. The tone is light and mocking, showcasing the camaraderie among the hosts as they riff on audience comments and their observations about these personalities, illustrating a satirical take on niche internet culture.
01:30:00 In this section, the hosts engage in a humorous and chaotic discussion about various figures in their community, poking fun at them with tongue-in-cheek comments and jokes. They reference a Super Chat from a viewer supporting a character named Shane and joke about the absurdity of wearing someone like a "skin suit." The conversation continues with banter about another member's work, contrasting actual content creation with perceived laziness. They also mention the bizarre competitive dynamics within their community, highlighting how certain individuals take offense or react when the tables are turned on them. The hosts express disbelief over some creators' obsession with fans and their channels, all while weaving in hefty doses of sarcasm and absurd humor regarding personal struggles and the pointless nature of certain rivalries. Overall, the mood is light-hearted, mixing critiques with playful jabs at various personalities.
01:35:00 In this section, the discussion revolves around various antics and conflicts within the comic creator community, featuring multiple personalities and heated exchanges. Participants reference a controversial meme involving a figure named Rob Casey, jokingly attributing a haunting presence to him, while also critiquing another creator, John, regarding his behavior and personal life. The dialogue turns to mocking artistic skills, particularly focusing on critiques of different creators' work, and remarks on past interactions that have led to current tensions. Throughout the conversation, there's a blend of humor, insults, and tongue-in-cheek commentary, illustrating the drama and rivalries that are prevalent in their circle.
01:40:00 In this section, the hosts engage in a heated discussion about online drama related to "Comicgate," poking fun at various individuals and their reactions. They call out perceived hypocrisy among their peers, particularly targeting one individual for being overly sensitive and allegedly "crying" on Twitter after a stream. The conversation switches between mocking comments about past interactions, drawing jokes about the absurdity of their foes, and referencing a supposed "Zade raid," indicating some playful rivalry. Throughout, there's a mix of sarcasm and insults directed at others' online behaviors, revealing the hosts' disdain for what they describe as degenerate actions within the community.
01:45:00 In this section, the speakers engage in a heated and sarcastic conversation about various individuals in the comic book community, particularly focusing on personal failures and reputations. They mock someone, referred to as Matt, for an apparent obsession with meaningless competitions and for struggling with personal issues, including a failed marriage. Additionally, there is a back-and-forth regarding perceived incompetence and artistic abilities, suggesting that Matt isn’t as talented or respected as he claims, drawing comparisons to the struggles of being a creative professional. The speakers express their frustration with people who block or silence dissenters in the community, underscoring a sense of camaraderie among those who share their disdain for these practices. Overall, the tone is critical, sarcastic, and reflects a deeper commentary on the dynamics within the comic book fandom.
01:50:00 In this section, the speakers engage in a humorous and chaotic discussion about their interactions on a show, elaborating on the playful dynamics of putting someone "in the back" and the perceived seriousness of various participants regarding their creative processes. They mock Matt Bar for his supposed drawing skills and the absurdity of using a "quantum computer" reference, which was initially a joke aimed at another person, Liam. The conversation further devolves into banter about doxing and personal attacks, with a focus on John’s misunderstandings and the group’s tendency to laugh off tensions. The section is characterized by lighthearted insults and a comedic take on their online personas.
01:55:00 In this section, the speakers engage in a lively and somewhat comedic discussion about various individuals within their community, particularly focusing on someone named John and his perceived grievances. They joke about John's reactions to other members, including a figure referred to as Lord Raptor, and engage in playful banter about nicknames and personal attributes, delving into an exaggerated debate about someone's appearance and past actions. The conversation touches on themes of doxxing and personal attacks, with a lighthearted tone that belies the serious implications of the topics at hand, while also mocking those who have taken grievances too seriously. The overall mood is sarcastic and irreverent, with a mixture of personal anecdotes and humorous speculation about others.
In the video "Born on a Noose-EMERGENCY NOOSECAST!," the conversation delves into the chaotic dynamics within the Comicsgate community, highlighting themes of doxxing, personal attacks, and the deterioration of rational discourse. Participants engage in heated debates, particularly targeting individuals like Lord Raptor Jesus for hiding behind online personas and demanding transparency to restore accountability among creators. The dialogue swings between serious allegations and light-hearted banter, often poking fun at the absurdity of the situation, particularly regarding the perceived decline of the movement and the influence of misinformation. Amidst critiques of various artists and ongoing controversies, there are poignant reflections on the struggles of comic artists and the challenges of maintaining relationships within a fractious online space, ultimately showcasing a blend of humor, frustration, and nostalgia for the community's past ideals.
02:00:00 In this section, the conversation revolves around personal attacks and accusations related to individuals' private lives, particularly involving hypothetical scenarios where comments about relationships lead to aggressive reactions. The speakers discuss the absurdity of claims regarding someone's marital status while mocking those who spread misinformation. They highlight how such discussions often devolve into childish arguments rather than rational discourse, demonstrating the influence of online personas and how they distort reality. The mention of a supporter named St. Patrick T adds a layer of drama to the unfolding conflicts within the group, as they joke about his role in igniting disputes.
02:05:00 In this section, the speaker engages in a heated confrontation with someone named Lord Raptor Jesus, accusing him of hiding behind an online persona and challenging him to reveal his real identity. The speaker expresses frustration over doxxing fellow backers of a movement they once supported and reflects on the negative changes within this community. They insist on transparency, demanding that Raptor Jesus goes public with his identity and personal background. As the exchange escalates, the speaker suggests that Raptor Jesus is avoiding accountability and engages in a mix of banter and criticism, indicating that the behavior in the community is dragging down the very ideals they once cherished.
02:10:00 In this section, the conversation revolves around a mix of light-hearted banter and serious allegations regarding doxxing within the community. The speaker discusses an ongoing situation involving John, who appears to be accused of revealing personal information about individuals in the chat, while others joke about the absurdity and seriousness of doxxing. The discussion drifts into humorous criticisms of various community members, including snarky remarks about personal appearances and behaviors. As tensions rise, participants challenge each other to reveal their identities, arguing that content creators should be held accountable for their words and actions. Overall, the scene captures a chaotic blend of humor, challenges, and discussions about online privacy and accountability in a digital space.
02:15:00 In this section, the hosts discuss the controversial practice of doxxing, particularly in the context of online debates among content creators. They highlight a scenario where one creator, referred to as Lord Raptor Jesus, is pressured to reveal personal information like his name and location before being allowed to engage in a discussion. This demand is portrayed as a tactic to avoid meaningful debate and distract from the actual issues at hand. The hosts mock the absurdity of such demands, emphasizing that the focus should be on the topics being debated rather than personal lives. They also mention previous instances of similar tactics used against others, suggesting a pattern among certain creators to dodge confrontations by shifting the focus to personal attacks.
02:20:00 In this section, the speaker, a long-time supporter of Comicsgate (CG), expresses frustration over the perceived decline of the movement and the return of individuals they feel are undesirable elements. They reference historical efforts to "gatekeep" against such influences, while criticizing a specific person named Cherry for allegedly causing issues within the community. The discussion then shifts to various individuals and their online personas, including Mr. Dongs and Matthew Fowler, with speculation about identity and behavior. A new participant, Chuck, joins to highlight a past tweet from someone who jokingly suggested self-harm over a disagreement, further emphasizing the chaotic and contentious nature of their interactions. The section captures the emotional intensity and conflict within the CG community as members grapple with their shared history and evolving dynamics.
02:25:00 In this section, the host discusses various topics, including updates on a KD launcher model related to historical military vehicles, and introduces the sponsor, Rubicon Models. He humorously highlights the mishaps of assembling the model, making jokes along the way. The conversation shifts to promoting a comic book campaign, where the host expresses concern over its poor sales compared to another campaign that had a very successful launch. The tone becomes more confrontational as the host criticizes another character, Lord Raptor, accusing him of lacking courage and falling for 'rage marketing.' The dialogue features banter about coins and model components, concluding with laughter and camaraderie amid the chaos of their live stream.
02:30:00 In this section, the hosts engage in a lively and often irreverent discussion about an artist named Kirby, who seems to have a unique and controversial approach to his work. They humorously critique the quality of certain comic book art, illustrating their points with exaggerated laughter and sarcasm. Kirby's interruption leads to a playful chaos as the conversation shifts toward the implications of negative product sales and the consequences of poor artistic performances. The hosts banter about the merits (or lack thereof) of various comic projects, particularly focusing on a creator named John, whose work appears to be struggling. Overall, the tone is comedic and self-deprecating, with moments of camaraderie and sharp criticism.
02:35:00 In this section, the discussion revolves around various criticisms and banter regarding artistic styles and experiences in the comic industry. The speaker comments on an artwork that features strange and awkward elements, leading to a humorous debate about drawing skills. They ridicule another artist, Matt, for his inability to draw basic shapes quickly, while also showcasing their own commercial art credentials, including working for the UN and Marvel. The playful yet caustic interaction highlights a rivalry, with reference to jealousy and professional aspirations, revealing a mix of personal anecdotes and sarcastic jabs about each other's careers within the art community.
02:40:00 In this section, the discussion revolves around the perceived lack of talent and popularity of a certain artist in the comic book industry, specifically criticizing their artwork and social media presence. Various participants express disdain for this artist, comparing their work unfavorably to others and discussing how such criticisms have led to a decline in their reputation. The conversation humorously touches on the concept of "Raptor Coin," with participants jokingly competing for this virtual currency, alluding to a playful, competitive atmosphere among the chat. There's also a broader commentary on the impact of social media interactions on professional relationships within the comic community, with some mocking perceived elitism and the state of one's career in light of their industry connections.
02:45:00 In this section, the speakers discuss the undervaluation of comic book artists in the industry, highlighting the disparity between the potential earnings from commercial projects compared to the reality of struggling artists. They reference personal experiences with famous comic book creators, expressing disillusionment with how some artists are treated and the lack of support they receive, such as needing GoFundMe campaigns for basic needs. They share anecdotes about past collaborations and interactions, particularly with Dan Fraga and an event involving Sketch Therapy, while also critiquing Fraga's current decisions and work ethic amidst personal challenges. Overall, the conversation sheds light on the broader issues within the comic book industry, emphasizing the need for artists to seek more sustainable career paths.
02:50:00 In this section, the conversation revolves around various interactions within the comic community, including a memorable appearance by Chris Kirkpatrick on a show and commentary about Anna (the Star Wars girl), while also touching on personal and interpersonal jabs between participants. Tensions rise as John defends his status as the primary breadwinner at home, while others tease him about it, leading to a discussion about mod behavior in chat rooms and how they handle disruptive commenters. The dialogue escalates as accusations fly regarding personal grievances tied to past incidents, with John criticizing unnamed individuals for their reactions and behavior online, creating a chaotic and confrontational atmosphere as they navigate humor and conflict within the streaming community.
02:55:00 In this section, the speaker recounts a gathering where casual conversations veered into the topic of ongoing conflicts in the comics community, particularly highlighting the personal issues some individuals are facing, such as divorce. They express frustration over how connections and alliances were perceived and manipulated among those involved in Comicsgate, particularly targeting Ethan and Phil for their alleged exclusionary behavior and misunderstanding of relationships. The speaker also criticizes the tendency to group individuals together based on rumors and accusations, suggesting that misunderstandings led to hostility rooted in jealousy over creative projects. They emphasize that arguments and personal grievances took precedence over any substantial discussions regarding the actual content and merits of the comics being produced.
The YouTube video "Born on a Noose-EMERGENCY NOOSECAST! 'COMICSGATE DOXXING CUSTOMERS, AND ATTACKING OG FANS!'" captures the tumultuous dynamics within the comic book community as various participants engage in sharp, accusatory banter about doxxing, personal attacks, and artistic credibility. Central figures like Matt and John come under fire for their perceived weaknesses—be it in their understanding of comic art or their inability to participate sincerely in discussions—leading to a chaotic exchange filled with insults, sarcastic humor, and reflections on industry practices. The speakers also critique the pressures of public persona within the community, lamenting the opportunism and hypocrisy they see in peers, while simultaneously promoting their projects and discussing competitive tensions among creators. Amidst the harsh critiques, the conversation reveals deeper frustrations about loyalty, authenticity, and the evolution of cultural standards within what they term the Comicsgate movement.
03:00:00 In this section, the discussion revolves around a contentious online interaction where various participants address accusations and insults directed at each other, particularly focusing on Matt and his supposed head wound. The speakers mockingly engage with each other, referencing prior jokes and comments made during streams, while asserting their positions. They delve into the nature of their exchanges, defend their humor as valid, and highlight the absurdity of some insults, reflecting the overall chaotic and confrontational tone of the conversation. The dialogue captures a blend of personal jabs, misunderstandings, and the ongoing drama within their online community.
03:05:00 In this section, the speaker expresses frustration with others in the comic community, particularly targeting individuals like Matt and John. They challenge the validity of accusations related to personal insults, asserting that mockery of one's appearance is a common tactic when arguments fail. The speaker critiques the pressure to be on camera, suggests it stems from wanting to emulate popular figures like Ethan Van Sciver, and points out hypocrisy in how these figures handle criticism. They reminisce about earlier times in the community while highlighting the inconsistencies in behaviors and reactions among prominent members, suggesting a lack of genuine engagement and calling out what they view as disingenuous criticisms made against them.
03:10:00 In this section, the speakers discuss the challenges of building an audience on platforms like YouTube, suggesting that starting with fewer than 20 followers may warrant not pursuing the channel further. They critique peers in the comic community who seem to suffer from a lack of recognition for their contributions, particularly highlighting Phil's unnoticed support to others. There’s mention of established creators like Billy, who successfully navigate their careers independently, contrasted with those allegedly pressured by influential figures like EVS. The conversation shifts to the dynamics of artist relationships in the comic industry, noting how writers must maintain consistent work and fair compensation to retain talent, as well as the risk of losing artists to better-paying opportunities. Lastly, there’s a brief promotion of a comic-related crowdfunding project, showcasing a blend of industry insights with promotional content.
03:15:00 In this section, the discussion revolves around comic book creators and their interactions, highlighting accusations of artists being poached, particularly focusing on a creator named Phil who seems to have attempted to attract talent from another creator, Tommy. The speakers then pivot to discussing comic book sales and promotions, with one promoting their own projects, including source books and trading cards, while criticizing others for their marketing tactics. There are humorous remarks about sales pitches, including a rather outrageous comment about a spouse, and a general banter about how various creators market their work, reflecting tension within the comic community. Ultimately, the conversation is infused with sarcasm and critiques of the comic book industry practices, alongside self-promotion for their own projects.
03:20:00 In this section, the discussion revolves around a figure named John, his questionable online persona, and his connections to contentious topics, particularly regarding other creators and their work. A participant criticizes John's originality for mimicking an old meme, referencing a problematic history of a character's design that links to themes of violence and morality. There's a focus on a deceased artist, Tommy Patterson, whose legacy is being overshadowed by John's controversial actions and comments, including a discussion on how to appropriately label certain content. The group engages in sarcastic banter about the requirements for appearing on John's stream, suggesting he imposes absurd demands to avoid genuine debate, leading to a comparison of John to a "Karen" figure. The conversation highlights a broader critique of the community and its players, marking a divide over defensiveness around contentious topics involving inappropriate content.
03:25:00 In this section, the speaker expresses strong criticism of Matt Bar regarding his understanding of comic book art, arguing that Bar's education and artistic insights are lacking despite claiming to know about art history. They assert that Bar has contradicted himself about their artistic style in a very short time and ridicule him for making personal attacks rather than substantive arguments. The conversation devolves into mocking Bar's lifestyle, with references to living conditions and comparisons of their respective homes and marital status, ultimately highlighting a sense of superiority over Bar while encouraging him to provide coherent arguments and defend his position. The speaker emphasizes the absurdity of Bar's statements and the inability of his supporters to present a logical narrative in their criticism.
03:30:00 In this section, the speakers engage in a heated and chaotic discussion, accusing each other of cowardice and unmasculine behavior while mocking one another's online personas. John is challenged for not publicly revealing his identity, with accusations of being a "crybaby" for overreacting to comments made about him online. The dialogue is filled with insults and sarcasm, with references to how they perceive masculinity and professionalism in the context of their activities in the comics community. Words like "meltdown" and "coward" are frequently used to belittle one another, and it reflects a broader conflict within their circles regarding loyalty, authenticity, and interpersonal dynamics.
03:35:00 In this section, the speakers engage in a heated discussion about a controversial figure in their community, using a mix of humorous and derogatory remarks. They criticize specific individuals for their perceived inability to participate sincerely in conversations and accuse them of spamming irrelevant messages to deflect from significant issues. The dialogue shifts to the topic of leadership and talent within the community, highlighting a perceived replacement of talented individuals with less capable figures, leading to resentment. The conversation underscores the sense of betrayal felt by certain members who believe that the community's standards have been lowered and reflects on how the dynamics of power and recognition have shifted, implying that those who are currently celebrated do not genuinely deserve their titles.
03:40:00 In this section, the speaker expresses outrage over the presence of underage bestiality-themed content within a community that was meant to reject such behavior, questioning how it has evolved into something they once opposed. They criticize individuals in the community as opportunistic "grifters" who don't genuinely care about the conservative values they claim to uphold, instead seeking financial gain. The speaker also shares personal experiences regarding their interactions with other community members and super chats, highlighting a tense atmosphere filled with accusations and insults toward those who challenge their views or bring up their past mistakes. The conversation is characterized by aggressive banter and a call for confrontation, reflecting underlying tensions and divisions within the community.
03:45:00 In this section, the speaker engages in a heated exchange regarding personal attacks and accusations of doxxing, emphasizing their defiance against critics who claim to have damaging information about their personal life. They assert that despite attempts to undermine them, especially regarding their marital status and their spouse's name, their detractors have failed to provide credible evidence or accurate claims. The discussion highlights the absurdity of the accusations and incorporates sarcastic banter about the internet culture of doxxing and public disputes. The speaker mocks their opponents for being incompetent and relies on humor to address the situation, asserting their confidence and correctness in the face of online trolling.
03:50:00 In this section, the speakers engage in a raucous and confrontational discussion centering on the concept of loyalty within the War Campaign community, peppered with insults and braggadocio. They mock each other, referencing past events where one of them drew less-than-complimentary images while also taking jabs at each other's artistic skills and personal lives. The dialogue shifts to ridicule perceived losers in their community while underscoring a shared disdain for individuals they believe threaten the integrity of their niche environment. The banter is laced with crude humor and bravado, reflecting internal conflicts and a sense of camaraderie among the participants despite the chaotic exchanges.
03:55:00 In this section, the discussion revolves around competitive drawing and the perceived skill levels of various artists, particularly focusing on critiques and challenges directed at a figure named John and others associated with Comicsgate. Host and guests express strong opinions about their superiority in drawing competitions, dismissing claims of tracing and challenging opponents to prove their abilities in real-time. Amidst the banter, there's a call to action for John to join the stream, share personal details, and confront critics directly, which highlights the competitive and sometimes aggressive nature of the community's interactions. The atmosphere is charged with taunts, accusations, and a playful yet intense call-out for a face-to-face showdown.
In the YouTube video "Born on a Noose-EMERGENCY NOOSECAST! 'COMICSGATE DOXXING CUSTOMERS, AND ATTACKING OG FANS!?'", the speaker and participants delve into a chaotic and heated critique of the ComicsGate community, targeting individuals like Raptor and John for their perceived cowardice and controversial actions. The dialogue is rife with humor, sarcasm, and personal jabs, as they explore issues stemming from doxxing, spamming, and the treatment of loyal fans. Amidst the playful banter, they highlight the absurdity of various situations—ranging from inappropriate initiation antics within groups to tense disputes about comic book artistry—while taking aim at the changing dynamics within the community. The ongoing tensions reveal frustrations with perceived betrayals among creators and fans, culminating in a lively exchange that oscillates between mockery and serious commentary on social and cultural issues within their niche.
04:00:00 In this section, the speaker aggressively calls out an individual named Raptor, labeling him as a coward for refusing to confront him directly. The speaker expresses disdain for Raptor's character, emphasizing his alleged fear and inability to appear on camera, while also mocking Raptor's situation with personal jabs about his life. Humor and sarcasm are prevalent as the speaker refers to various scenarios involving Raptor, including a supposed bathroom break and the absurdity of their online interactions. The speaker also delves into accusations of doxxing and spamming, while maintaining a tone of defiance and challenge towards Raptor, which they believe reveals hidden vulnerabilities in Raptor’s persona.
04:05:00 In this section, the speaker discusses a range of contentious topics related to an individual named John, making light of John's remarks about his wife in a joking fashion while simultaneously criticizing John's actions. The dialogue is chaotic, suggesting tensions around comic book sales and accusations directed at "OG fans" and other creators. The speaker calls out a user, "Lord Raptor Jesus," challenging them to reveal their identity, and reflects on their own comic book offerings, hinting at an unusual promotional strategy that seemingly hasn't resulted in improved sales. There's a blend of humor and frustration as they lament the treatment of loyal customers and hint at a private members-only stream to delve deeper into these issues.
04:10:00 In this section, the discussion revolves around the controversial practices within a group known as War Campaign, where it was allegedly common for members to send inappropriate photos as a form of initiation. The speakers reflect on the absurdity of such actions and share various anecdotes about individuals who participated, including one who sent a photo out of anger. They also delve into a rivalry involving a figure named John, discussing his declining subscriber count and the banter between him and his critics. The conversation takes a crude turn as it shifts focus onto John’s alleged obsession with discussing inappropriate themes linked to a particular anime, leading to a lively and chaotic dialogue among the participants, showcasing a mix of humor and harsh criticism amidst their back-and-forth exchanges.
04:15:00 In this section, the discussion revolves around characters from anime and the controversial fan fiction related to them. The speakers express frustration with one participant, Anna, who tries to elaborate on a character's backstory, only to be met with interruptions and dismissals from others who claim she is not addressing the right character or topic. The conversation quickly devolves into bickering about the appropriateness of certain themes within fan fiction, particularly concerning underage content, and the dynamic shifts to personal attacks and accusations of jealousy among the participants. They also touch upon previous interactions between the participants and express disbelief regarding the focus of the conversation, asserting that the initial topic was about community issues rather than specific anime content.
04:20:00 In this section, the host and guests engage in a heated discussion involving various characters within the ComicsGate community, focusing on personal conflicts and accusations. There are mentions of individuals being called out for their behavior, such as someone hiding behind an avatar while making inflammatory remarks. The dialogue includes humor and sarcasm, particularly regarding recurring discussions about someone's obsession with dogs and the underlying tensions between different factions. There's also commentary on attempts at apologizing and navigating tricky social dynamics within the community, highlighting the complexity of friendships and rivalries in the face of public scrutiny. Overall, the exchange blends mocking humor with serious accusations as participants navigate their discontent and frustration with one another.
04:25:00 In this section, the participants engage in heated discussions about accusations of doxxing within the Comicsgate community, suggesting that certain individuals, particularly John, are stirring up trouble for personal gain or self-promotion. They reference past grievances and question the integrity of various creators, contrasting their loyalty as long-time backers with current trends in the community, which they feel undermine original fans’ contributions. Additionally, they express skepticism about the monetary motivations behind certain campaigns while mocking the lack of progress on previously funded projects. The dialogue is filled with frustration and a sense of betrayal as they grapple with the transformation of the community and the interpersonal conflict it has generated.
04:30:00 In this section, the participants are engaged in a heated exchange, with one individual calling out another for being scared and refusing to show their face or share personal information while accusing them of doxxing. The conversation is filled with insults and aggressive confrontations, with one person asserting that they are merely a backer while the other aims to expose personal details. They discuss the implications of sharing personal information online as a creator and express disdain for the other’s perceived cowardice. Overall, the tone is confrontational and chaotic, with an emphasis on public personas and the consequences of online interactions.
04:35:00 In this section, the speaker reflects on the chaos surrounding a livestream featuring John, expressing amusement at the drama involving personal attacks and online doxxing. John appears frustrated as he asserts that no one can harm him due to his clean record. The conversation shifts to mocking comments made by viewers, particularly about accusations thrown at him and others in the community. The speaker describes the atmosphere as filled with hostility, as they quote interactions from the chat highlighting disagreements and tensions. They underscore the absurdity of the situation, emphasizing that viewers need not dig for information or controversy, as John openly shares everything during the stream. Overall, the tone conveys a mix of disbelief and humor regarding the ongoing conflicts within the online community.
04:40:00 In this section, the participants engage in a chaotic and humorous discussion filled with repetitive mentions of "dog," leading to a series of comedic tangents and mixed signals regarding the conversation's focus. Amidst the banter and joking, references are made to personal life and memes, notably a shoutout to a character named "cornbread man." The group is aware of the time spent in their lengthy stream and suggests saving some content for a later discussion, indicating a playful yet disorganized flow of conversation that oscillates between topics.
04:45:00 In this section, the discussion revolves around the chaotic aftermath of a live stream featuring John, where participants express amusement and disbelief at his behavior, which they describe as "full insane." Amidst setting up polls and heavy banter, the speakers share a mix of humor and concern for John’s mental state, joking that he might be in despair over having won a meaningless online competition. They also tease about giving him a comforting "binky" and trophy for his efforts. As the conversation shifts, they plan to watch another video that touches on the same themes of drama within the comic community, reflecting on how John’s insecurities are purportedly behind the turmoil, while another participant humorously laments the emotional toll it seems to be taking on everyone involved.
04:50:00 In this section, the speaker engages in a heated discussion with a participant named Matt, criticizing him for contradictory statements regarding comic book style and artistry. The speaker accuses Matt of not being consistent in his critique, oscillating between saying the speaker lacks style and claiming they imitate Rob Liefeld's style. This exchange leads to further banter and insults directed at each other and other commentators, including references to personal lives and humorous jabs about their situations. The dialogue reflects a chaotic online atmosphere where comic book culture intersects with personal attacks, emphasizing the absurdity in some of the rivalries and accusations within the community, ultimately culminating in a tongue-in-cheek public service announcement about the dangers of crack.
04:55:00 In this section, the conversation shifts to a mix of humor and serious commentary regarding drug use, particularly referencing "crack house coffee" as a humorous exaggeration. The participants discuss various topics, including the challenges faced by a female writer who refused to depict characters in an underage context within a comic community, which led to her ostracism. They also touch upon self-deprecating jokes about personal appearances and mental states, with some participants making light of someone's wig and physical characteristics. The dialogue reflects a blend of absurdity and commentary on social and cultural issues, revealing the dynamics within this online community while engaging in a somewhat irreverent tone.
In the YouTube video "Born on a Noose-EMERGENCY NOOSECAST! 'COMICSGATE DOXXING CUSTOMERS, AND ATTACKING OG FANS!?'", participants engage in a humorous yet critical discussion about controversies within the Comicsgate movement, including accusations of inappropriate behavior and the acceptance of underage content by certain members. They express disillusionment with individuals like Ethan and Matt B, reflecting on their initial hopes for a positive community that have since been dashed. Amidst playful banter, the speakers critique the lack of accountability among creators and lament over the degradation of values within their circles, while navigating personal grievances and the impact of online discourse on relationships. The tension is palpable, revealing a mix of frustration and camaraderie as they mock various personalities and prepare for an upcoming Meme Awards event with light-hearted anticipation.
05:00:00 In this section, the discussion revolves around various controversies involving public figures and creators, specifically focusing on accusations of inappropriate behavior. Participants mockingly reference a gym interaction, criticizing irrational statements made by others. They touch upon past incidents involving Chris Benoit and child safety concerns, while sarcastically questioning the credibility of those involved. The conversation highlights a particular creator's alleged dishonesty regarding serious topics, with references to offensive content and an apparent disregard for accountability. Throughout, humor and incredulity are used to address these serious allegations, suggesting a frustrated response to perceived hypocrisy within their circles.
05:05:00 In this section, the speakers express their strong disapproval of certain individuals and practices within the Comicgate movement, particularly the introduction of underage content. They discuss past incidents involving a person named Katia, revealing their concerns about the implications of her actions and the potential legal consequences. The speakers share their desire to distance themselves from those who support or engage with such controversial material, emphasizing that they do not want to be associated with anyone who promotes inappropriate content. They lament the fact that they had previously held out hope for positive change within the community, only to feel disillusioned by the ongoing acceptance of what they describe as morally questionable behavior.
05:10:00 In this section, the speakers reflect on their experiences with the Comicsgate movement, expressing a mix of sentimentality and disillusionment. While some feel a sense of regret over the association with the movement due to its negative direction, they still cherish their support for individual creators they admire. They acknowledge the camaraderie and connections they've made over the years, but express disappointment over the actions of certain figures within the community, suggesting that some individuals, like Matt B, exhibit narcissistic traits that undermine the movement's initial intentions. The conversation transitions to playful banter and mockery, highlighting a mix of frustration and humor as they discuss the various personalities and dynamics within Comicsgate, while also emphasizing a longing for the community to return to its more positive roots.
05:15:00 In this section, the participants discuss their limited interactions with John, revealing that he lacks awareness of certain characters and situations, leading to impulsive reactions. They express confusion over John's sudden acknowledgment of one participant as a "king," interpreting it as either a joke or a moment of sincerity. The conversation touches on the ongoing tensions in the community, as members highlight their consistent efforts to promote various projects, contrasting it with John's failure to engage in similar promotional activities. The group reflects on how their collective frustrations have been accumulating over time and how John's behavior has sparked conversations about their roles within the community.
05:20:00 In this section, the speakers discuss the backlash faced by a person named Katie, who is accused of devoting too much time to online streams instead of her family. They reflect on the criticism aimed at Katie regarding her promotional efforts for various campaigns, which they believe were previously successful yet appear to be struggling now. The conversation also touches on the dynamics of their online community, including discussions about moderating roles and membership statuses, while ridiculing competitors who they accuse of laziness in content creation. The mood is one of frustration with those attacking them, with a call for new material rather than repetitive old jibes, as they express incredulity at the bitterness displayed by detractors.
05:25:00 In this section, the speakers express their disillusionment with certain figures in the Comicsgate movement, particularly Ethan. They discuss rumors and perceptions of jealousy that they reject, asserting that their involvement in Comicsgate was motivated by a desire to support creators rather than seek positions of power. They criticize Ethan and others for self-sabotaging the movement and indicate that they felt threatened by their promotion of smaller creators, which led to a rift. The speakers highlight how many individuals who left Comicsgate have found success independently, implying that the leadership within Comicsgate is failing to adapt to or support these creators, instead focusing on disparaging them.
05:30:00 In this section, the discussion focuses on the contrasting attitudes and changes over time of a character named Dale, particularly comparing his past enthusiasm for projects with his current situation, which seems much more negative and filled with stress. The speakers express frustration over how Dale's legacy is being threatened by others in the community, noting that despite the praise he receives, there are also significant criticisms about his reliability and mental state. They mention the passive-aggressive behavior from other individuals and highlight a character named BFTT, who, despite some positive traits, is not entirely viewed favorably in this context. The conversation becomes increasingly heated and critical, with personal attacks and a general tone of mockery towards those not fully engaged in the current projects and dynamics within the community.
05:35:00 In this section, the participants engage in a chaotic discussion, reflecting on past interactions within the community and the drama surrounding various online personalities. They touch on a narrative involving a woman who falls down a well while contemplating her past, hinting at broader themes of nostalgia and regret. The dialogue shifts to accusations and blame concerning a channel strike involving Shane, where it's revealed that the incident stemmed from an issue with his own content rather than interference from others. As they navigate through personal grievances and community tensions, they point out inconsistencies in past claims and behaviors, particularly criticizing misunderstandings related to characters in an anime context. The section ultimately portrays a fractious atmosphere, filled with sarcasm and debates about intentions and reputations within their niche community.
05:40:00 In this section, the conversation revolves around various members of the comic community engaging in a heated discussion about online criticism and personal attacks related to appearance and identity within the Comicsgate movement. Participants express their views on the behavior of certain individuals in the community, highlighting their disdain for negatively critiquing others while defending their positions. While some make light-hearted jabs about personal traits, such as body image and grooming, it becomes clear that underlying tensions exist within the community, prompting discussions about how to handle criticism and online interactions. The tone oscillates between playful banter and serious reflection on the impact of online discourse, revealing divisions among fans and creators alike.
05:45:00 In this section, the conversation revolves around the complexities and tensions within a group discussing a public figure and perceived injustices in the comic book community. One participant expresses discomfort with others defending her, suggesting that she prefers to handle her battles alone. Amidst this, various members share their perspectives on interpersonal conflicts, including accusations and drama reportedly involving figures like Matt Bar and Eric July. The dialogue highlights the emotional stakes of the participants, with comments about one individual appearing to be on the verge of tears, as well as references to heated Twitter exchanges and threats made in the context of a complex relationship dynamic. The atmosphere is characterized by camaraderie but also reflects underlying tensions and grievances among the participants.
05:50:00 In this section, the participants express disbelief and mockery towards someone named John, who seems to be involved in a conflict or confrontation with them. They question what receipts John claims to have against them, asserting that he has nothing of substance. The tone is aggressive and filled with insults, illustrating a heated atmosphere. The conversation shifts to light-hearted banter about dogs and an inside joke involving another character, "Ro," with playful exchanges and exaggerated reactions. Multiple quick comments and laughter illustrate the chaotic nature of the discussion, leading them to wrap up the lengthy livestream with the suggestion that they need to prepare for future content.
05:55:00 In this section, the discussion revolves around the upcoming Meme Awards event and the anticipation surrounding it, with participants encouraging the audience to prepare their memes. They also share lighthearted banter about a guest named Mandy, debating her age humorously while referencing her physical abilities. The conversation shifts to the notion of competition between different personalities in their respective genres, asserting there’s no real competition. Amidst the jokes and exchanges, there is a playful acknowledgment of missing Mandy, leading to speculation about a potential replacement named Ruiz, although it is clarified that Ruiz isn't really replacing Mandy. Overall, the tone is casual and comedic as they prepare for future events.
In the "Born on a Noose-EMERGENCY NOOSECAST!" video, the hosts engage in lighthearted banter, weaving humor and inside jokes throughout discussions about doxxing and the tensions within the Comicsgate community. The segment features playful exchanges regarding napping, cigarette breaks, and chaotic conversations often revolving around dogs, particularly teasing someone named Cherry. One host comically expresses anxiety about their dogs' safety from an unsettling figure named Katie, further contributing to the whimsical tone. Despite the serious themes of doxxing and community conflicts, the atmosphere remains jovial, with the hosts thanking their audience and teasing an upcoming meme awards event, ending with a musical interlude.
06:00:00 In this section, the discussion appears to be a lighthearted banter among participants on an ongoing show, with references to previous topics and comedic exchanges. One host expresses skepticism about a certain event happening, while another reassures them that it will occur. The group shares inside jokes and humorous anecdotes about napping and cigarette breaks. As the segment wraps up, the host expresses gratitude to the audience, hints at an upcoming meme awards event, and ends with a playful musical interlude, reflecting a relaxed and jovial atmosphere despite the underlying themes of doxxing and community tensions.
06:05:00 In this section, the speakers delve into a chaotic and humorous conversation filled with interruptions and playful banter, often centered around the topic of "dogs". Various mentions of frustration and confusion occur as they attempt to engage with clips and jokes, particularly directed at a person named Cherry, implying a mix of inside jokes and light-hearted teasing. The dialogue reflects a combination of frustration, random dog-related commentary, and playful rhymes, culminating in a whimsical tone that carries throughout the segment.
06:10:00 In this section, the speaker expresses a humorous and exaggerated concern for the safety of their dogs from someone named Katie, who they describe as frightening and unsettling. They emphasize their efforts to keep their dogs away from her, highlighting their anxiety and the lengths they will go to ensure their pets remain safe. The speaker wraps up with a playful shout-out to the chat audience and mentions an upcoming newscast, creating a lighthearted atmosphere despite the underlying theme of tension related to Katie's presence.