Summary of Best Cordless Vacuum? $99 HART vs $250 Ryobi, $300 LG, $349 SHARK, $439 Tineco, $750 Dyson

00:00:00 - 00:20:00

The video compares the performance of different cordless vacuum cleaners on different surfaces and features. The Dyson V15 vacuum cleaner is found to be the best overall, with the highest suction power and longest runtime.

• 00:00:00 In this video, we test the best cordless vacuum cleaners on the market. We test the 99-dollar Hart vacuum cleaner against the 250-dollar Ryobi, the 300-dollar LG, the 349-dollar Shark, and the 439-dollar Tineco. The Hart vacuum cleaner performed the best in both airflow and suction, but it was also the heaviest and the most expensive. The Ryobi One Plus HP was the runner-up in terms of airflow and suction, but it was the least expensive. The Ryobi One Plus HP also includes a brushless motor, a micro crevice tool, a crevice tool dust brush, and a mini beater bar. The LG A9 performed the best in terms of suction, but it was the heaviest and the most expensive. The Shark vertex was the runner-up in terms of suction, but it was the lightest and the least expensive. The Shark vertex also includes a removable battery, a 25.2-volt 2.35-amp hour battery, up to 60 minutes of runtime, a dual clean attachment that includes a floor and carpet brush roll, a dust bin that can be emptied while on the tool or removed for easy cleaning, and a pre-filter and a
• 00:05:00 The video reviews different cordless vacuum cleaners, comparing their performance and features. The Dyson V15 vacuum cleaner is found to be the best overall, with the highest suction power and longest runtime.
• 00:10:00 The video compares the performance of eight different cordless vacuum cleaners on different surfaces, including sand, rice, and hair. The heart (a $99 HART vacuum cleaner) performed the best overall, with 84 grams of sand collected in 100 grams of rice. Ryobi and LG vacuum cleaners came in second and third, respectively. The Dyson fan favorite, the Ford, tied for first place with the LG and Ryobi. The Shark and Tenco were the only two vacuums to pick up all the rice. The LG and Tenco both did well on the hair test, while the heart and Ryobi struggled. The Tenco was the best performer when it came to collecting goldfish and Cheerios. The Dyson was the worst on both tests.
• 00:15:00 The video compares five cordless vacuum cleaners: the $99 HART, the $250 Ryobi, the $300 LG, the $349 SHARK, and the $439 Tineco. All five vacuums performed well on the rice test, but the LG and the Shark performed better on the Cheerios test. All five vacuums performed well on the sand test, but the Samsung and the Dyson performed better on the crevice test. The Samsung and the Dyson came out on top in terms of maximum run time.
• 00:20:00 The video compares the performance of a number of cordless vacuums, including the $99 HART, $250 Ryobi, $300 LG, $349 SHARK, and $439 Tineco. The Dyson vacuum came out on top in all categories, with an average finish of 1.5. The Samsung vacuum had an average finish of 2.8, Tenco 3.3, and LG 3.8. If one took into account the subjectively graded areas, the Shark would likely move up, but the top three would likely remain the same.