Summary of La Teoría del Conflicto y el legado de Remo Entelman

This is an AI generated summary. There may be inaccuracies.
Summarize another video · Purchase summarize.tech Premium

00:00:00 - 01:00:00

This video discusses the theory of conflict and the legacy of Remo Entelman. It argues that conflict is a normal part of human interaction, and that it can be beneficial if used correctly. Entelman also discusses the theory of strategic interaction, in which two entities interact to achieve a mutually beneficial outcome.

00:00:00 This academic session titled "The Theory of Conflict and the Legacy of Remo Entelman" is being held by Claudio Lucky, professor of law at the Universidad de Buenos Aires, and will focus on the work of Remo Entelman, a naval officer and philosopher who pioneered the study of maritime conflict. The session will also discuss the application of conflict resolution theory to current challenges, such as climate change. Francisco de Santibáñez, Vice President of the Argentine Confederation of Business, is giving the welcome address. Aldana Sosa, professor of human rights and international public law, will provide the main presentation.
00:05:00 Remo Entelman's work on conflict theory has had a lasting impact on the Caribbean, where he was developing ideas that finally began in his theory of conflicts. His work synthesizes his legacy and ideas, which we will discuss today. I see many friends here who are interested in this topic, so I want to say hello and thank them all at the same time. I also want to thank my friend and mentor, Calcaterra, who is also a disciple of Remo and who coordinates the Seminar on Conflict and Values. I am grateful for the opportunity to make a brief introduction to the work of the kingdom, followed by two main points of his theory and application. After that, I would like to discuss one of his books, which I haven't read, but which I have heard good things about: Explaining the Theory of Conflict and Values Development. Then, I will move on to discuss one of the main challenges we face in the field of climate change: the lack of legal solutions. Remo's theory provides us with some potential solutions to this problem. Finally, I will touch on a topic that is very close to my heart: interreligious dialogue. Remo's theory of logic tells us that anything that is not prohibited is permitted,
00:10:00 Remo Entelman's famous book, "The Theory of Conflict and the Legacies of Remo Entelman", discusses the concept of conflict and its role in human relations. The main point of the book is that conflict is a normal part of human interactions, and that it can be beneficial if used correctly. Entelman also discusses the theory of strategic interaction, in which two entities interact to achieve a mutually beneficial outcome.
00:15:00 Remo Entelman's book, "The Theory of Conflict and the Legacy of Remo Masi" provides a comprehensive theory of conflict, focusing on the role of human rationality. He argues that, in order to understand any conflict, it is necessary to understand its rational aspects. This theory provides a general framework for analyzing any conflict at any level of existence. Entelman's work on the theory of conflict has been ongoing for several years, and has led to the development of a set of analytical concepts applicable to any conflict. He defines conflict as a social relationship between at least two actors in which their respective behaviors are in opposition. Conflict can always be observed, as it is a manifestation of competing interests. The theory of conflict provides a framework for analyzing both static and dynamic conflicts. The static analysis focuses on the analysis of conflicts at a certain level of existence, while the dynamic analysis considers conflicts as they evolve over time. Entelman's work has had a significant impact on the field of negotiation, and his theory of conflict is often referenced in academic literature on the subject.
00:20:00 The following video discusses the theory of conflict and the legacy of Remo Entelman. According to Entelman, there is a relationship between this theory and the current conflict in Argentina. He argues that a critical analysis of coalitions is important in understanding the thought behind the kingdom's approach to the conflict over the Falkland Islands. He then goes on to discuss the theory of dynamic development, which is related to the two concepts he calls "the laws of development" (i.e. economic development and social development). He argues that the conflict is evolving and being modified based on the intensity of actions taken by the actors and the scale of the variables involved. In addition, he discusses the importance of emotions and wills in conflict, and points out that conflict can have different dimensions depending on how the objective or usefulness of one actor is prioritized over the actor itself (i.e. actor-oriented conflict). He finishes by discussing the legal system as a mechanism for managing conflicts at both the international and domestic levels, and asks the audience to read his book when it is released. The video discusses the theory of conflict and the legacy of Remo Entelman. According to Entelman, there is a relationship between this theory and the current conflict in Argentina. He argues
00:25:00 This video discusses the theory of conflict and the legacy of Remo Entelman. According to this theory, the social complicity of the present day is the result of a late invention in the history of civilization, which emerged around 25 years ago (in the 21st century) and 2500 years after the Roman Empire. The theory posits that the civilizaton's adoption of positive law in order to deal with increasingly sophisticated societies is a response to this need. However, this approach has some limitations. First, the law uses violence when it becomes a judicial issue. Second, the system does not process conflicts where there is no prohibited behavior. This results in a lot of unresolved conflicts. And, although the use of conflict resolution through positive law has achieved a high level of intensity in some cases, it cannot handle them all because there is no legal rule that can be applied when conflict resolution fails. This leads to the third problem: precarization. As a result, people are forced to resort to violence in order to resolve conflicts, which is not a good way to preserve social ties and relationships.
00:30:00 The video discusses the theory of conflict and its impact on the legacy of Remo Entelman. It also discusses ways to resolve conflicts peacefully and constructively, including the role of critical analysis, coalitions, and mediators. Finally, it mentions the importance of the tree-and-forest model in poverty reduction.
00:35:00 The video discusses the theory of conflict and Remo Entelman's legacy. It states that while the theory of conflict is important, it should only be used to diagnose pure conflicts or must include the complementary negotiation approach that seeks communication perpetual reciprocity. A question posed by viewers is whether the theory of conflict should only focus on the pure diagnosis, or if it should also include the use of strategies and practices that go beyond analysis. Entelman provides examples of applications of the theory of conflict in his three articles about the Malvinas conflict published in Clarines in 1996, Indivisibility of Sovereignty in October of 1996, and Negotiating the Malvinas Conflict published in the Institute of Security and Strategic Studies' (ISS) July 2006 bulletin. He concludes that the theory of conflict should be used to better understand conflicts that are currently being analyzed or that may occur in the future, and it should be accompanied by a society that develops a conscience about life and understands the conflict through the perspective of human rights, history, and the natural environment.
00:40:00 This is the view of the kingdom in regards to conflict and its legacies from Remo Entelman. He develops these ideas by looking at the theory of Moisés. There are many applications of the theory of Moisés, including the sovereignty issue here. We have a problem because we cannot determine which goal is the incompatible goal in this conflict - Argentina's sovereignty or the sovereignty of the United Kingdom. If Argentina's sovereignty is Argentine, it cannot be British. And if British sovereignty is British, the Argentine people cannot have it. Asking the customer this question reveals a problem. When we talk about sovereignty, it has an important emotional and symbolic component. However, if we look a little further down at practical questions, we are talking about things like control of territory, the language and legal system that is applied, defense of that territory, etc. That is to say, the concept is divisible. If we have a divisible concept, we might be able to find a solution for a sum of variable, not a sum of cubes. Lowering the goal of the symbolic would make negotiations more likely to succeed. Second, the role of the Islanders is well known by both sides of the conflict. He says that using my triad theory is
00:45:00 The video discusses the theory of conflict and the legacy of Remo Entelman. It emphasizes the need for positive action to achieve a net positive outcome, and that this can never involve a decrease in the intensity of grievance. It goes on to say that an intelligent act of peacemaking does not involve saying "good" in reality, but rather seeking to resolve conflict through respectful, constructive interaction. Hostility will not achieve this goal, and a good relationship will instead involve being very firm in pursuit of one's goal, while still maintaining a friendly relationship with the other actor. Conflict resolution is not achieved by simply being nice to one's opponents, but rather by establishing certain boundaries in order to prevent permanent damage to either party. This opens the door for imaginative proposals to resolve the conflict, which could involve a shift in the Argentine government's claim to sovereignty over the Antarctic islands. However, I believe it is important to hear the opinions of those involved in the dispute, and I invite you to continue the discussion in future posts.
00:50:00 Renowned conflict theorist Remo Entelman discusses his theory of conflict and its impact on human behavior. He discusses Plato's idea of a "cooperative agreement" that would guarantee the security of interested parties in the Antarctica, and Socrates' argument for cooperatively managing resources in the Antarctic. He also touches on the issue of the Antarctic Treaty System, and how its various components might be helpful in resolving the conflict over the Antarctic. In conclusion, he argues that by expanding our understanding of conflict, we'll be able to arrive at a better solution.
00:55:00 The video discusses the theory of conflict and the legacy of Remo Entelman. It argues that Chilean sovereignty is the opposite of territorial integrity, and that if we send the principle of autonomy and if this principle of free self-determination is present, this right would only strengthen the principle of autonomy. In a first analysis, we would say that giving minority Islanders the right to self-determination would only strengthen the principle of autonomy on a first level, which is to say that they would have a voice in determining their own destiny. That day, I mean, a little bit, I want to say that we have a legal position based on the issue of minors, which is to keep the territorial integration intact. I don't like the idea of weakening a legal position to say that it is quite important to reserve it for negotiations, so that the role of the Islanders as defined in the Constitution is good libertarian because we are saying that we don't want to intrude their lifestyle, but we're not giving them the ability to negotiate or to produce. I mean, completely define nothing if we commit ourselves to defending their lifestyle. This would have a clear spy track, an interim status for the issue of the Malvinas, which is defined in the Constitution the way it is

01:00:00 - 01:20:00

In the video, Remo Entelman discusses the theory of conflict and the legacy of Remo Sardone. He begins by saying that not many people only wanted to cite a conflict authority because he lived in real life. He then quotes the Samoan proverb, "Do not send a shaman to solve all conflicts; no matter how intransigent they may be, they are capable of being resolved peacefully." This reminds him of a quote by Remo, which was always "not to have to do without religion of luck anymore, there's no conflict as complex that if application of the tools is done well, it cannot be resolved in a consensual way."

01:00:00 In this video, Remo Entelman discusses the theory of conflict and the legacy of Remo Livio. He believes that it is no mystery that this is what he says, in some way we have to recover that confidence strengthening our institutions, security, justice, etc. which, of course, are currently fragmented in the country. I think that we have to advance correctly by negotiating if we want to be a country that is trusted and respected internationally. Our actions should be predictable and this would give us, say, hope. We have the moral strength and, although the moral force to demand a revolution and that the islands and demand the return of their property, I think we have quite a strong moral force because we don't, but some were illegally appropriated illegally by an act of force and also the English maintain a negationist, negative position that is unacceptable to say because that has never been willing to negotiate and has no moral authority to demand our that we have. We also have moral authority, but it is not as strong as it used to be because we have allowed our institutions to become corrupt. We need to have a good joint committee of the islands, and go through the process of strengthening that good will looking inward and seeing them as politically, we have
01:05:00 The video discusses the problem of cultural differences, and how some people view the world in a ideological way and no longer debate climate change due to the lack of evidence. It also discusses the problem of positional bargaining, where one has to give up a position in order to maintain credibility. He argues that sometimes it is better to abandon a position in order to move to a better one that actually defends our interests better than the previous one. These are general problems at the level of geography, public, and private. They don't involve a huge complexity of relations of interactions, and there is no way to resolve this issue with a centralized command and control system. We need to focus on the positive aspects of the situation and try to find solutions that benefit both sides. He recalls a ten-year ago conversation he had with the then Secretary of the Environment of the United Kingdom, and what he said was very clear: we need to stop talking about catastrophes and start talking about all the benefits we would have if we focused on mitigation and adaptation. This requires intelligence, knowledge, dedication, and positive mentalities, and I believe that many of us are starting to lose sight of these things. However, the problems of climate change are also conflict-ridden, and we
01:10:00 Remo Entelman discusses the theory of conflict and the legacy of Remo Sardone. He begins by saying that not many people only wanted to cite a conflict authority because he lived in real life. He then quotes the Samoan proverb, "Do not send a shaman to solve all conflicts; no matter how intransigent they may be, they are capable of being resolved peacefully." This reminds him of a quote by Remo, which was always "not to have to do without religion of luck anymore, there's no conflict as complex that if application of the tools is done well, it cannot be resolved in a consensual way." Entelman then presents business. He says that it's good to have something to say, and asks for forgiveness but if he went on a bit longer, he would have to hurry to answer questions. Georgie mentioned that the main reason for conflict is fear of our deeply-rooted instinct of conservation. Entelman agrees and goes on to say that as long as open, reciprocal learning and cooperation among people is taking place, conflicts will be avoided more easily. He then brings up the example of Argentina's claim to sovereignty over the life and other spaces in the Atlantic south. He believes that these conflicts can be
01:15:00 This video discusses the theory of conflict and Remo Entelman's legacy. Claudio discusses how intensity seems to be thanks to Claudio and Gloria's interventions. It was revealed that there is space for others to share their opinions. Additionally, Claudio asks for the floor to speak. He says that terms like "to ask for the word" are commonly used in order to request a word from the speaker. The course is only for all types of people to talk about painting a floor. I thought that with the topic of the Falklands War, the presentation was over. However, I was wrong. There are still aspects of the presentation that I would like to discuss with Rodolfo. Regarding the diet, I have already received it and it is being listened to perfectly. I would like to thank the entire group for their comments. I am still working on putting the notebooks together. Guys at the Institute used to have a permanent seminar series named after Remo. Claudio also celebrates the occasion of Claudio putting enough emphasis on the center and Ambassador. Regarding the Falklands War, he asks that we not forget that when we made the decision to honor Remo, we were not simply creating him. The modern theory of conflict, which is a response to complex
01:20:00 This video discusses the theory of conflict and the legacy of Remo Entelman. Palabra discusses the opposing perspective, good if you're seeing more comments, let's go ahead and conclude this meeting academically but not without first thanking the very interesting presentation by Claudio Look and the comments from Doctor Calcaterra and officials and also from the Caribbean. We hope this type of exchange and reflection will continue to be present at our meetings, and that we are always treated to such high quality presentations like this one. Thank you to everyone who participated, including our presenter, many thanks Claudio for accompanying us. Francisco and Ambassador with his generosity is an amazing experience and very interesting, thank you to everyone and good afternoon. There were good interviews. I.