Summary of "Lo que el psicoanálisis enseña a las neurociencias".

This is an AI generated summary. There may be inaccuracies.
Summarize another video · Purchase summarize.tech Premium

00:00:00 - 01:00:00

The video discusses how psychoanalysis teaches neuroscience. It discusses how psychoanalysis can help to verify the teachings of psychoanalysis, and how it can be used to orientate the viewer towards a different perspective on psychoanalysis. It also discusses how there may be some confusion among the public about what psychoanalysis is and what it entails, and how neuroscience has helped to fill in some of the gaps in understanding.

00:00:00 In this video, a philosopher and psychoanalyst discusses what the psychoanalysis teaches neuroscience. The philosopher discusses how contact with psychoanalysis has fundamentally changed his thinking about neuroscience and its implications. He cites a case study from his book in which a patient with schizophrenia drew a tree with three eyes, below which was a phrase in Italian. The philosopher says that this case is an example of what the psychoanalysis can teach neuroscience, which is that the perspective of the patient is always important.
00:05:00 The video discusses the impact that psychoanalysis has on neuroscience. It discusses how psychoanalysis can help to verify the teachings of psychoanalysis, and how it can be used to orientate the viewer towards a different perspective on psychoanalysis. It also discusses how there may be some confusion among the public about what psychoanalysis is and what it entails, and how neuroscience has helped to fill in some of the gaps in understanding.
00:10:00 The video discusses the principles of neuroscience that explore how the brain affects behavior. Eric Kandel, a Nobel Prize-winning neuroscientist, discusses how the brain is essentially a muscle that can be trained to function better. He also discusses how genetics, environment, and development play a role in mental illness.
00:15:00 The video discusses the perspective that we can call totalizators, which believes that there is nothing that can happen in the life of a human being that is not determined by the brain or that has no impact on zero. Psychotherapy believes that the changes that it produces over time have long-term effects, and that it can also change the genetic expression. One of the most extraordinary discoveries in neuroscience is the discovery that memory is stored in new neurons. In this sense, the book that Candle wrote is not the only one that has had a significant impact on neuroscience, but it is the one that was able to determine this based on studies of very primitive animals, for example, a Madagascar lemur. I remember the name of a new community of spiders that I had never heard of before. We have billions of neurons, while they have only 250. This is what allowed Candle to understand the research on memory. He says that if that organism is so primitive, it could possibly have memory and be able to remember events that had a lasting effect. This is what I see in the creation of a new neuron here. That is to say, the memory trace was sitting in a new neuron, and the conclusion that
00:20:00 Freud broke with the idea of localization, or "staying within a certain area of the body," in neuroscience in the early 20th century, because he believed that the mind was too complex to be localized to one area of the brain. However, in recent years, neuroscientists have been able to make more accurate determinations of brain function by studying how interconnected structures work together. This breakthrough is especially important because it allows for more precise distinctions between more basic functions and more complex ones.
00:25:00 The article discusses Freud's idea of the "virtual" and how it differs from the traditional view of the body in neuroscience. Freud proposed that the body is not limited to materiality, and that there is a "virtual" aspect to the body that exists before the conscious and unconscious stages. He argued that this virtual aspect of the body is what allows for the production of images in the brain. The article discusses how this virtuality is important for the development of a concept of paralysis, and how it breaks with the traditional idea of body location in neuroscience.
00:30:00 The article discusses how neuroscientists are investigating paralysis, and how it is an important field of research. It goes on to say that while the study of paralysis is important, it is also important to remember that the disorder is not just caused by damage to the nervous system, but can also be caused by a break in the victim's psychological trauma. Freud was the first to discuss this, and it is important to mention him because he was the first to introduce the idea of "psychical paralysis." He argued that people who suffer from hysteria and other forms of neurosis are actually pretending to be paralyzed, and that their symptoms have no real value. However, his argument has a great deal of value because it reveals something that neuroscientists often ignore- that neurosis is a real phenomenon, and that it can be taught and understood through the lens of psychoanalysis.
00:35:00 This video discusses how psychoanalysis teaches neuroscience. It notes that while neuroscience does not have to deal with neurons, Nicolás and the brain damage caused by stress circuits can help us understand how someone's arm can move or how they can't move it. It goes on to say that, in terms of Freud, electrical activity takes organs in the popular sense of the word-namely, those located on the extremities-and calls it the "sensual signification." Freud's theory of psychoanalysis led to the development of therapeutic practices such as Freudian psychoanalysis, which changed the symptoms' manifestation. It is argued that, from the perspective of psychoanalysis, the body is a symbolic system that is determined by the language used to refer to its significant elements, and that this system governs the body's actions. It is concluded that, because the body speaks in terms of signification, it is able to communicate through symptom manifestation.
00:40:00 The video discusses the significance of Freud's discovery that the word has a value and importance, even if the brain does not change. Freud's idea that the word has a value and affects the person on a fundamental level is still relevant today.
00:45:00 The conclusion of this study is that the reward center in the brain is responsible for the compulsive use of a palanquita, or lever, by rats. This study also showed that the dopamine reward pathway is responsible for the activation of this area in the brain.
00:50:00 The video discusses how psychoanalysis teaches neuroscientists about the brain. It discusses how drugs like cocaine can reward users, and how these rewards occupy a place in the brain called the "receptor." The rat is then shown to be satisfied and does not continue to decrease in activity, which is called the "palanquita effect." This is similar to how human beings experience pleasure. The second problem neuroscientists face is that different activities provide different rewards for humans, which makes it difficult to determine pleasure in experiments with animals. For example, one activity might be rewarding for one person and not for another. The video then goes on to discuss how psychoanalysis has discovered that pleasure is inherent to being alive and that it conflicts with a neuroscientific theory that argues for self- preservation.
00:55:00 The video discusses Freud's theory of the pleasure principle, which states that humans seek pleasure and avoid pain. Freud discovered that this principle is not limited to simple pleasures like those experienced during childhood, but can extend to more extreme experiences, such as death wishes and addiction. The video points out that, because Freud's theory is based on individual cases, it can be difficult to apply it to more complex behaviors such as socializing or drug use. However, because the theory explores the "más allá" of pleasure, it can provide insights into more complex behaviors.

01:00:00 - 01:20:00

The video discusses how psychoanalysis teaches neuroscience. Psychoanalysis can help to clarify some of the murky waters of neuroscience, and it is hoped that this will be the first of many opportunities to provide additional comments.

01:00:00 The video discusses the difference between psychoanalysis and neuroscience, and how psychoanalysis teaches neuroscientists things about the mind. It points out that, in some cases, neuroscientists can't determine if a mental illness is neurological or not, but they will still consider it. Danielle Pérez asks a question about plasticity, and the doctor responds that it is still an area of research, but that it is possible that there is some neurological component to mental illness. Lastly, Leticia asks about the relationship between neuroscience and ideology, and the doctor says that, in some cases, neuroscience can be used to support or justify ideological positions.
01:05:00 Psychoanalysts teach neuroscientists about the effective use of psychoanalysis. Going to a neuroscientist will not solve any problems, but it is important to know about the situation in order to make the appropriate referral. Melissa Molina explains how positivism, empirical evidence, and virtual reality can work together to predict outcomes. Marina Vargas points out that psychoanalysis can be helpful to other political movements. Daniel Pereznick discusses how children can enjoy themselves repeatedly through jokes. Finally, Mariana Vargas says that positivism, empirical evidence, and virtual reality are essential to the development of her son's computer skills.
01:10:00 The video discusses how psychoanalysis teaches neuroscience. Freud argued that the subject of psychoanalysis is in a state of pleasure and pain, which is a mixture of something that produces satisfaction and suffering. Neuroscientists and psychiatrists say that the act of speaking is totally conscious for the speaker, even if they appear to be speaking automatons. However, later in the video, Daniel Predice points out that rats in a lab are not always controlled by love and obedience, and can behave very humanly. This example demonstrates that the concept of 'humanization' is important in understanding how humans behave. It also shows that Freud's and pre-Freudian theories of psychoanalysis are not entirely consistent.
01:15:00 The video discusses the idea that different aspects of the unconscious can be studied by different disciplines, and that psychoanalysis is one of these disciplines. Sacas de otra parte, a black man from Africa, discusses how he was unaware that this was said honestly. He also discusses the idea of the unconscious being divided into two camps: the unconscious for neuroscientists, who has been nominated for a Nobel Prize, and the unconscious for itself. Oliva Volaris, a professor of neurobiology, says that the work of Freud was important in understanding the unconscious, but that it is not the basic work. Another professor, Mercedes Sánchez, says that positivism, the philosophy that holds that knowledge is objective, is wrong. She argues that knowledge can be subjective, and that one of the texts questioning this is José Octavio Reza Becerril's article, "What is the unconscious?". Sacas de otra parte says that he appreciates the request, and that he will answer the question about the unconscious. He then discusses the unconscious in relation to Freud's work on the unconscious, and how it is a precursor to more advanced work. Finally, he discusses how the work of a front neurologist would not be sufficient to understand the
01:20:00 The video discusses how psychoanalysis teaches neuroscience. It states that because of the way that psychoanalysis is conducted, it is possible to clarify some of the murky waters of neuroscience. It is hoped that this will be the first of many opportunities to provide additional comments.