Summary of ESTO NO TE GUSTA en REALIDAD: EL SINSENTIDO DEL DISEÑO en la MODA RÁPIDA

00:00:00 - 00:15:00

The video discusses the nonsensical and bizarre designs found in fast fashion , highlighting the lack of meaning and thought behind them. It delves into the legal gray area of copying designs, the prevalence of social homogenization, and the origins of certain design elements. The speaker questions the use of phrases, names, and imagery that seem unrelated and confusing. Overall, it sheds light on the lack of context and individuality in fast fashion design choices.

• 00:00:00 In this section, the speaker discusses the bizarre and nonsensical designs found in fast fashion, particularly in stores like Kiabi that lack a clearly defined style. They highlight the legal gray area surrounding the copying of designs by fast fashion companies, and how this can negatively affect smaller designers. The speaker also mentions how luxury brands often turn a blind eye to the copying because it helps promote their brand and reach a wider audience. They then provide examples of these nonsensical designs, where designers seem to be copying and pasting elements without any real thought or meaning behind them. The focus is more on what people believe they like based on repetition rather than appealing to their individual tastes or references.
• 00:05:00 In this section, the video discusses the comedic duo Pantomima Full and their videos that touch on stereotypes and people's outfits. While never explicitly talking about outfits, each character they portray has a specific outfit that is often hilarious. The video also explores the phenomenon of social homogenization and how everyone ends up dressing similarly. They analyze phrases and designs commonly found in fast fashion, such as "qualitycraft goods," "denim dry woods," and "true denim dening club," and explain the origins and meanings behind them. These phrases often evoke a sense of durability, strength, and adventure, appealing to a specific target audience.
• 00:10:00 In this section, the speaker discusses the origins of certain design elements in fast fashion. The use of denim, for example, can be traced back to Levi Strauss in the 19th century, who sought to provide miners with durable clothing. The speaker also mentions the prevalence of deer and horse imagery in clothing, questioning the original inspiration for these designs. Additionally, the speaker notes the widespread use of references to specific locations in the United States, such as Oregon, without a clear reason or connection. The section concludes with a discussion on the popularity of chrome designs, which originated from the graphic design style of the 80s and can now be seen in various merchandise. The speaker raises questions about why certain band logos, such as AC/DC, are featured on clothing sold in mass-market retailers, sometimes even paired with unrelated phrases. Overall, the speaker highlights the lack of context and meaning behind the design choices in fast fashion.
• 00:15:00 In this section, the speaker questions the bizarre trend of using the name "Brooklyn" on various fashion items. They find it odd how people outside of Brooklyn would wear clothes with "Brooklyn" written on them, as it seems unnecessary and unrelated. They also discuss the prevalence of flag designs, particularly those of the United Kingdom and the United States, in fast fashion. Additionally, the speaker mentions the random phrases and words printed on clothing that often make no sense and only serve to confuse the wearer. Overall, they highlight these nonsensical design choices in the fashion industry that nobody seems to understand but are still widely produced and worn.