Summary of INTELIGÊNCIA ARTIFICIAL E DIREITOS AUTORAIS

This is an AI generated summary. There may be inaccuracies.
Summarize another video · Purchase summarize.tech Premium

00:00:00 - 00:20:00

The video discusses the issue of artificial intelligence and copyright law. American lawyer, Steven Tyler, has rejected the idea of artificial intelligence being registered as a copyright owner because he believes that the image created by AI does not include a human element of authorship. This is an important issue for the protection of intellectual property rights, as the current Brazilian copyright law does not consider the creation of an "Espiritual" as an element of human authorship.

  • 00:00:00 This video discusses the history of artificial intelligence and its origins, and highlights the work of Alan Turing, who was the father of modern computing. Today, artificial intelligence is used to create poetry, music, videos, and images that are increasingly impressive. However, some people have raised questions about whether machines can be considered intelligent, and whether they can create art that is truly original. In response, Jason Nguyen created a piece of art using machine learning that won a prestigious art competition.
  • 00:05:00 As questions of who owns copyright in works created by artificial intelligence are on the horizon, as the rights become more and more relevant. The legal premiss behind this question is based on the principle that both a subject and an object of these rights exist in law. To understand this relationship better, we need to investigate what these two expressions mean for the law. According to the civil law system, every person is capable of rights and civil duties. This personal identity begins at birth and goes until death. This means that any person can purchase, sell, or engage in other civil activities directly or through attorneys even minors or people who are absolutely unable to cognitively due to any limitation. This means that all people are subject to rights within the legal system and possess a series of rights of personal personality, such as name, image, and honor. We also have objects of rights, everything that we can have or own including houses, cars, jewelry, credit, and even a Google account in the clouds. These are all objects of the law, which seeks to protect relationships between the creator and their works of intellectual or artistic creativity. The development of social, cultural, and technological advances in humanity as well as the production of large-scale products in new
  • 00:10:00 This video discusses the legal concept of intellectual property, which is the rule that law imposes on us today. According to this rule, only a human being can be the author and holder of moral rights to a work of art or scientific literature, that is, legal entities such as corporations cannot be authors or enjoy legal rights in this regard. These moral rights consist of claiming copyright at any time the work's name or pseudonym is assigned as the author, reserving the original work for future use, ensuring its integrity, and preventing modifications or practices that could damage its reputation or honor. Furthermore, the author has the moral right to modify the work before, or after, it is used or even still in circulation, if this results in any harm to its reputation or image. And lastly, the author has the right to have access to the original work to preserve its memory. However, even though legal entities cannot be authors and cannot enjoy these moral rights, they can still be the holders of copyright rights to a work of art if we speak of it as having a dual nature because the author can enjoy both moral and proprietary rights to the work.
  • 00:15:00 The video discusses the topic of artificial intelligence and intellectual property rights. American lawyer, Steven Tyler, has rejected the idea of artificial intelligence being registered as a copyright owner because he believes that the image created by AI does not include a human element of authorship, as decided by the Brazilian conselho do nexo between the human mind and creative expression. This is an important issue for the protection of intellectual property rights, as the current Brazilian copyright law does not consider the creation of an "Espiritual" as an element of human authorship, which is an important part of the rights granted to a machine. This decision is recent and we do not know yet the scope and importance that artificial intelligence will have on our lives, including the creation of works of art and their economic and patrimonial rights. Steven Tyler proposed one possible alternative to be created in the future by lawmakers when intellectual property and artificial intelligence rights are discussed more fully - to create legal rights for artificial intelligence as well as humans. This is one of the paths that is already being defended by intellectual property scholars, as well as one day being considered equal to a legal person. One of the central arguments for this path is to make artificial intelligence also a subject capable of practicing acts of civil life
  • 00:20:00 The video discusses the possible economic benefits and lack of specific copyright legislation for users of artificial intelligence platforms, and discusses one way these users can protect their creations - by reading the terms of use carefully. There is a risk of future problems with copyright infringement if these platforms are not regulated. Tácio danger, a public administrator and science communicator, discusses his work in this area in a separate video.

Copyright © 2024 Summarize, LLC. All rights reserved. · Terms of Service · Privacy Policy · As an Amazon Associate, summarize.tech earns from qualifying purchases.