Summary of [SEVENTEEN] GOING SEVENTEEN 2019 EP.19 논리나잇 #1 (Debate Night #1)

00:00:00 - 00:25:00

In the first episode of SVT Logic-ly Night, a debate takes place between two teams where they present their logical arguments on various topics. The first topic discussed is Living with 3 eyes vs. Living with 3 hands. Team Interstellar argues that having three eyes is more useful for self-diagnosis and could prevent the risk of speaking stupid things when put to sleep with anesthesia. In response, Team Currently argues that having three hands is more useful for food consumption and is convenient for playing computer games. The hosts then discuss the use of hand attachments and their role in performing tasks or sending hearts. The debate between Mr. Seungkwan and Shua focuses on the importance of eyes versus being able to hold hands with others. The members of SEVENTEEN engage in a debate on whether it would be better to live with the body age of 10 forever or the body age of 60 forever. The participants also discuss the limitations and capabilities of a person's age. Throughout the episode, the hosts express their thoughts and opinions, responding to and rebutting each other's arguments.

• 00:00:00 In this section, the first episode of the SVT Logic-ly Night show is announced. In the debate portion of the show, each team will take turns presenting their logical argument, and the opposing team will have the opportunity to rebut the argument. The debate topics are chosen through a random draw, and the first topic of the episode is Living with 3 eyes vs. Living with 3 hands. The hosts, Wonwoo Jeon and Mr. Shua, explain the procedures for the debate and introduce the first team, named Interstellar. Team Interstellar's logical argument is that having three eyes is more useful than having three hands because it allows for self-diagnosis, the ability to check every part of the body, and can prevent the risk of speaking stupid things when put to sleep with anesthesia. The debate continues with Team Currently's rebuttal, which argues that having three hands is more useful because it allows for easy consumption of food and is convenient for playing computer games.
• 00:05:00 In this section, the video excerpt discusses various gameplay scenarios and opinions regarding how convenient they are. The group discusses the multi-handed version of rock-scissors-paper and how it allows for more options, as well as the debate around whether using a hand on the butt can become a simplified chair. The hosts also share their opinions on the importance of eye contact in communication and how sending hearts while looking in the eyes is more meaningful. The discussion then turns to the use of hand attachments and whether they should be used to send hearts or perform other tasks. Throughout the section, the hosts express their thoughts and opinions, while also responding to and rebutting each other's arguments.
• 00:10:00 In this section, the debate continues between Mr. Seungkwan and Shua on the importance of eyes versus the need to be able to hold hands with others. Shua argues that clothing with two arms is the norm these days and one cannot have a complete outlook without money to buy clothes. They also believe that being able to hold hands with others is key to moving forward with them. Mr. Seungkwan seems to agree but also adds that eyes are important to offer kindness to those in need. The discussion then shifts to how hands can be used effectively in various scenarios, such as eating and moving around, making the case for multi-handed actions. Overall, the debate highlights the importance of different aspects of human capabilities in achieving success and satisfaction.
• 00:15:00 In this section, the members of the Korean pop group SEVENTEEN engage in a debate on the topic of whether it would be better to live with the body age of 10 forever or the body age of 60 forever. The team with the body age of 60 argues that having a wider variety of experiences and enjoyment of content in life would be more fulfilling than that with the body age of 10. In genesis, they posits that having a qualitative life with their physical abilities, mental abilities, and stamina, would allow them to have endless stamina throughout their day, better math skills, and the ability to produce creative content. They also mention that having their mental age as their real age would mean that they can continue to grow along with their passions, friends, and relationships.
• 00:20:00 In this section of the transcript, the topic of discussion is inconveniences that arise when performing various roles in society. The 10-year-old child is mentioned as a particular instance where such inconveniences may be felt. The discussants propose that a 10-year-old's simple actions or inactions may be perceived as advantageous in certain situations, but that they will never criticize or exploit this. They agree that the situations should be debated to gain a better understanding of their impacts and consequences.
• 00:25:00 In this section, the discussion centers around the limitations and capabilities of a person's age. The participants argue about whether being 10 years old would be better because it would mean a smaller stomach and reduced cost on food. It is pointed out that at the age of 10, a person can legally earn money through various activities such as part-time jobs or even YouTube channels. The debate takes a turn when the discussion focuses on the age of 60 and whether it would be better than being a 10-year-old. It is argued that being a 10-year-old means being healthier and having nicer skin compared to a 60-year-old. However, it was ultimately decided that age is just a number and the mental age is what truly matters.