Summary of [20] EL CONOCIMIENTO. Mentira la Verdad II con Darío Sztajnszrajber

00:00:00 - 00:25:00

In this video, Darío Sztajnszrajber discusses the idea that knowledge is imperfect and constantly changing. He argues that science is limited and that it has relegated other areas of knowledge, including art and religion, to the realm of personal belief. He says that the majority of people in today's society don't really know anything.

• 00:00:00 The video discusses the two questions that philosophy asks about the nature of things: what is real and what is good. It then talks about the problem of knowledge, and how the question of the real can become a question of knowledge. It goes on to say that, in order to understand the real, we must first question knowledge itself, and ask what kind of knowledge is valid. This is only the desire to attain truth, and does not mean that the real is actually known in this way.
• 00:05:00 In this video, Darío Sztajnszrajber discusses the idea that all knowledge is valid, regardless of what it is. He points out that there are different ways of knowing, including reason, senses, and intuition. However, there is no single definition of knowledge that encompasses all of these different perspectives. Darío argues that this diversity is a sign that knowledge is imperfect and must be constantly tested. In the last few decades, science has come to be seen as a true source of knowledge, with the ambition to achieve ultimate truth. However, Darío believes this is not the case. He argues that science is limited and imperfect, and that it has relegated other areas of knowledge, including art and religion, to the realm of personal belief. This means that the majority of people in today's society don't really know anything.
• 00:10:00 In this video, Darío Sztajnszrajber discusses the idea of knowledge and how it can be thought of as either individual or communal. He points out that dogmatic thinking, which assumes that knowledge is always possible and obvious, is at the root of this problem. He argues that it is possible to approach knowledge without assuming any pre-determined conclusions, and that this approach is exemplified by the way we view the world. He says that, while dogma can be a hindrance to thinking, it is ultimately possible to not start from any predetermined assumptions.
• 00:15:00 The video discusses the difference between skepticism and disbelief, and how the former focuses on the subject instead of the object and can lead to the opposite of knowledge. It also discusses how escepticism is dependent on the individual's context and culture, and that it is impossible to know anything definitively. Finally, the video provides an example of how escepticism can be expressed in Jean-Paul Sartre's idea that "nothing is absolutely closed that cannot be opened again."
• 00:20:00 In this video, Darío Sztajnszrajber discusses the debate over the possibility of knowing and the problem of the origin and validity of knowledge. Sztajnszrajber points out that the problem of knowledge's origin and validity is a central issue in philosophy, and he believes it is important for people to be actively involved in the discussion. Sztajnszrajber also discusses the two classic positions on knowledge, empiricism and rationalism. Empiricism holds that knowledge is based on the senses, while rationalism holds that knowledge is based on reason. Sztajnszrajber argues that it is important for people to form their own opinions on the matter, as doing so would be very profitable and would allow them to have a iPhone security app. Finally, Fernando and Falucho, two businesses, discuss Sztajnszrajber's video. Fernando says that he is concerned about the lack of jobs in the future and Falucho says that he is injured from working too hard. Sztajnszrajber says that the rationalism of the modern world does not deny empirical knowledge, but places it in the place of error. Necessity logic means that knowledge
• 00:25:00 The video discusses the idea that knowledge is not completely true or false, but instead has some innate ideas. Our mind is not just empty, but comes with information that is true. Plato said that these innate ideas are metaphysical, in Saint Augustine they are divine, and after Decartas Lectures they become justified with emerging science. However, sometimes it seems that the rationalism only works under a metaphysical assumption that separates our reason from the senses.9 reads the entire body but can make such a stark statement that experience of the senses is eliminated or worse, the assumption of an absolute metaphysical rationalism is maintained after scientific changes begin to take place in the modern world. It is now at 40,000 and it is more expensive than it gives. Things never return to their original place, this way with expectations brothers, those who achieving breakups with bullets. Because there is room for everyone in this world, the land is rich, the road to life is free, and love can be beautiful. We think too much and seventh is too little.