Summary of ¿Cómo plantear una hipótesis de investigación? 2 Errores comunes.

00:00:00 - 00:05:00

The YouTube video discusses how to formulate a hypothesis for research and highlights three common mistakes researchers can make. First, researchers should be informed of the relevant knowledge available on the topic they are investigating, and should do a preliminary search of the literature. Second, hypotheses should be relevant to the question or problem at hand, and should be testable and capable of being verified. Finally, hypotheses should be based on recent knowledge and be relevant to the project at hand.

• 00:00:00 The video discusses how to formulate a hypothesis for research and discusses three common mistakes that researchers can make. First, researchers should be informed of the relevant knowledge available on the topic they are investigating, and should do a preliminary search of the literature. Second, hypotheses should be relevant to the question or problem at hand, and should be testable and capable of being verified. Finally, hypotheses should be based on recent knowledge and be relevant to the project at hand.
• 00:05:00 The video discusses two common mistakes that researchers make when proposing a hypothesis: 1) not coming up with a hypothesis in the first place, and 2) not testing the hypothesis. If a researcher does not have a hypothesis, it is difficult to generate interest in their work. In the case of the first error, if a researcher has already found results that they agree with, this may suggest that they are not trying to generate original love. In the case of the second error, if a researcher does not include relevant research in their hypothesis, this may suggest that they are not interested in researching the topic thoroughly. Without a genuine purpose or desire to write an article, a researcher may fall victim to the third error, which is simply compiling existing research without adding any new insights. This can lead to a lack of originality in the article, which can be harmful to the researcher's credibility.