Summary of ENTENDA as SÚMULAS 637, 733 do STF e 311 do STJ. Recurso Extraordinário, Precatório e Intervenção.

00:00:00 - 00:05:00

The video explains that there are certain cases where an appeal (recurso) is not allowed. These include when the decision being appealed is from a political body, or when the case involves a precatório (a type of payment order).

• 00:00:00 This video discusses the admissibility of recursos extraordinários, precatórios, and interventions, specifically referring to the three súmulas of the Supreme Tribunal of Federal and the Superior Tribunal of Justice. The three súmulas are 637, 733, and 311, and the STJ's 311. The article 102, which discusses the Supremo's jurisdiction, states that an extraordinário or especial recurso is allowed only if it is filed in the Federal Court's jurisdiction. The two cases where a recurso ordinário is inadmissible are when it is filed against a decision manifesting the political-administrative power, and when the precatório regime is in place, as is the case with article 100 of the Brazilian Constitution. Based on this constitutional provision, the recurso extraordinário, especial, or special must be admissible in order to be filed. The two cases where a recurso ordinário is inadmissible are when it is filed against a decision made in the processing of a precatório, or when the decision has been made and passed in judgment. If the decision is unfavorable to the
• 00:05:00 The Supreme Court ruled that it is not permissible to appeal an order of the court of justice that denies a request for intervention. This administrative action has a political rather than a judicial nature, meaning that there is no need for an emergency appeal.